Preamble
This recipes book proposal aims to put together 50 home cooked recipes by residents of Hougang. It is a community project that aims to engage Hougang families and promote family bonding through the food they grow up with, supported by the Hougang Women Support Network (HWSN). The team will visit Hougang families and get them to share about food and fond memories on their dining tables.
Background
This recipe book was inspired via a chanced encounter with a Hougang resident during a community trip, the HGCC’s 2011 one-day Island Tour. While everyone was having packed lunch at the temple, an elderly lady walked around with a container filled with home made Blanchan (spicy chili paste). She was happily offering it to everyone to add spice and flavour to the meals.
I was concerned that the blanchan might be too spicy and the elderly aunty said in Mandarin, “Don't worry, it is not spicy. A little bit will add colour to your rice. The "red" colour is very nice!" She was lighthearted and very motherly. In my mind, chili's primary objective was to add the "spice" effect of a dish and I had never thought of my rice “looking pretty in red” until that day.
The above was my firsthand experience of the "Hougang Spirit" and I was truly amazed by that aunty’s willingness to share with people she knew and strangers, so their lunches could be tastier and more colourful.
Objectives
Without doubt, food is a necessity and an essential part of our life. Our mothers regardless of age, education level or financial positions will provide the best within their ability to feed and nurture their children.
The objectives of the would-be recipe book are:
1) Preserve our favourite home cooked recipes by women in the family.
2) Promote family bonding through recollection of their favourite home cooked dishes and why they feel that their mother’s or wife’s recipe is the best.
3) Encapsulate the love and devotion of a woman towards her family, through the 50 home cooked recipes.
Each recipe has a heartwarming story to tell!
Targeted Release Date
Mother’s Day next year (13 May 2012)
How to Participate?
We are inviting Hougang Residents to participate actively by contributing their mother / wife’s recipe and to write a short paragraph on why they feel that their mother / wife’s recipe is the best via email hgcc.enquiry@gmail.com. Each submission is subjected to review and a committee will request on-site visits, (if possible) a demonstration of the said recipe, food tasting and pictures will be taken during this whole process.
Subjected to individual preferences, the book would wish to acknowledge with contributor via surname and age. The book will categorize the recipes according to main ingredients such as fish, chicken, beef, vegetable, seafood, soup etc. This book is a multi racial fusion and will include recipes across ethnic groups in Hougang.
The above sharing is by Elayne Ang, our HGCC committee member, who is spearheading this project.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Second Media Release on Public Sites
We welcome the decision by Peoples’ Association (PA) to lift the restriction imposed on permit applicants on who they can or cannot invite to functions at sites now controlled by the PA. The restriction had caused many Aljunied residents to feel torn and in an emotional dilemma.
HDB and PA’s political role
We note, however, that contrary to PA’s earlier response that the decision to lease sites for community activities was “not new, nor is it peculiar to Aljunied GRC”, it now emerges that HDB’s decision was indeed precipitated by the General Election results in Aljunied GRC and the desire to secure key sites for PA activities at which grassroots advisors would be guests.
HDB has also not given any reason why a total of 26 strategic sites in Aljunied GRC had to be given up to PA’s exclusive control.
Further, the remarks by Desmond Choo, the defeated PAP candidate for Hougang SMC, confirm that the key purpose of a request to PA to lease sites from HDB was to enable defeated PAP candidates to re-emerge at key community sites in the capacity of grassroots advisors, which in his case is to expand his outreach to residents in Hougang SMC.
If PA accedes to Mr Choo’s request for 6 sites at Hougang SMC, and HDB approves it, it will further confirm the partisan nature of this decision by these government bodies.
WP’s Open Policy on Guests
We are puzzled by PA’s claim that “there have been occasions when organisers of grassroots and community events applied to use sites managed by Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC), and were told that they were expected to invite the local MP.”
We took over the management of TC on 1st August and no instruction was given either by the Chairman and Vice-chairmen to the staff on the issue of who permit applicants should invite. If MND has any information to the contrary, we will investigate the matter. In any case, it should be clear to all that there has never been any policy in both the former Hougang Town Council (HGTC) and AHTC to set conditions on the guest list. This is not a `new position’ as claimed by the PA, and is self-evident from the presence of PAP grassroots advisors at events held on Town Council-managed land in Hougang over the last 20 years and in Aljunied GRC after the General Elections.
PA’s assertions against Hougang Town Council
The grassroots advisor of Hougang SMC, Desmond Choo was reported to complain about how HGTC has curbed the activities of PAP grassroots. I am perplexed by the complaint. Compared to opposition party candidates who lost at election with no “toe hold” at all at the constituency in which he/she contested, the PAP candidate re-emerges as advisor to the PA grassroots organization which has a big community club and RC offices and centres at every zone of the constituency to operate from. How could elected opposition curb such activities?
Desmond Choo has raised some specific issues about HGTC in the past. Our detailed response is in Mr Low Thia Khiang’s Media Release on Hougang Town Council Management of Public Sites issued today which will show that Hougang Town Council has acted fairly to all parties.
Nevertheless, I am prepared to work with Desmond Choo if he faces difficulty from town council in using the sites he wanted for activities.
PA’s assertions against Aljunied-Hougang Town Council
As for Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC), PA cited two incidents which reportedly occurred during the handover period of May to July 2011, before the transfer of management on 1 August. AHTC itself was only legally constituted on 27 May 2011.
During the handover period, the former Managing Agent continued to deal with these matters, without any instructions issued from the Chairman or Vice-Chairmen of AHTC.
The same open policy with respect to guest invitations applies. There have never been any conditions about who residents need to invite to use AHTC-managed land.
Specifically in relation to the use of the open plaza in front of Block 151A Serangoon North Avenue 1, it had already been answered by the Chairman of AHTC in the Straits Times interview of 19 August that the decision had been taken by the former Managing Agent for reasons stated then.
Till date, AHTC has only received 2 applications from RCs from Bedok Reservoir Division and duly approved both of them, pending the RCs’ fee payment. On 15th August 2011 the PA sent an email application to hold a Mini Workforce Training Support Scheme road show from 3rd to 4th September 2011. This application is being processed.
Apart from the above there were no other applications received by the current administration prior to 19 August 2011 for functions by the RCs. There were also no calls made by the PA or RCs to the AHTC to do enquiries of any sort.
Conclusion
This episode has clearly illustrated how key government agencies with intense outreach capabilities can be mobilized to advance the political interests of the ruling party, and to undermine the mandate of opposition MPs given by the electorate.
We trust Singaporeans can assess what is fair for themselves.
YAW SHIN LEONG
MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT (HOUGANG)
VICE-CHAIRMAN, ALJUNIED-HOUGANG TOWN COUNCIL
HDB and PA’s political role
We note, however, that contrary to PA’s earlier response that the decision to lease sites for community activities was “not new, nor is it peculiar to Aljunied GRC”, it now emerges that HDB’s decision was indeed precipitated by the General Election results in Aljunied GRC and the desire to secure key sites for PA activities at which grassroots advisors would be guests.
HDB has also not given any reason why a total of 26 strategic sites in Aljunied GRC had to be given up to PA’s exclusive control.
Further, the remarks by Desmond Choo, the defeated PAP candidate for Hougang SMC, confirm that the key purpose of a request to PA to lease sites from HDB was to enable defeated PAP candidates to re-emerge at key community sites in the capacity of grassroots advisors, which in his case is to expand his outreach to residents in Hougang SMC.
If PA accedes to Mr Choo’s request for 6 sites at Hougang SMC, and HDB approves it, it will further confirm the partisan nature of this decision by these government bodies.
WP’s Open Policy on Guests
We are puzzled by PA’s claim that “there have been occasions when organisers of grassroots and community events applied to use sites managed by Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC), and were told that they were expected to invite the local MP.”
We took over the management of TC on 1st August and no instruction was given either by the Chairman and Vice-chairmen to the staff on the issue of who permit applicants should invite. If MND has any information to the contrary, we will investigate the matter. In any case, it should be clear to all that there has never been any policy in both the former Hougang Town Council (HGTC) and AHTC to set conditions on the guest list. This is not a `new position’ as claimed by the PA, and is self-evident from the presence of PAP grassroots advisors at events held on Town Council-managed land in Hougang over the last 20 years and in Aljunied GRC after the General Elections.
PA’s assertions against Hougang Town Council
The grassroots advisor of Hougang SMC, Desmond Choo was reported to complain about how HGTC has curbed the activities of PAP grassroots. I am perplexed by the complaint. Compared to opposition party candidates who lost at election with no “toe hold” at all at the constituency in which he/she contested, the PAP candidate re-emerges as advisor to the PA grassroots organization which has a big community club and RC offices and centres at every zone of the constituency to operate from. How could elected opposition curb such activities?
Desmond Choo has raised some specific issues about HGTC in the past. Our detailed response is in Mr Low Thia Khiang’s Media Release on Hougang Town Council Management of Public Sites issued today which will show that Hougang Town Council has acted fairly to all parties.
Nevertheless, I am prepared to work with Desmond Choo if he faces difficulty from town council in using the sites he wanted for activities.
PA’s assertions against Aljunied-Hougang Town Council
As for Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC), PA cited two incidents which reportedly occurred during the handover period of May to July 2011, before the transfer of management on 1 August. AHTC itself was only legally constituted on 27 May 2011.
During the handover period, the former Managing Agent continued to deal with these matters, without any instructions issued from the Chairman or Vice-Chairmen of AHTC.
The same open policy with respect to guest invitations applies. There have never been any conditions about who residents need to invite to use AHTC-managed land.
Specifically in relation to the use of the open plaza in front of Block 151A Serangoon North Avenue 1, it had already been answered by the Chairman of AHTC in the Straits Times interview of 19 August that the decision had been taken by the former Managing Agent for reasons stated then.
Till date, AHTC has only received 2 applications from RCs from Bedok Reservoir Division and duly approved both of them, pending the RCs’ fee payment. On 15th August 2011 the PA sent an email application to hold a Mini Workforce Training Support Scheme road show from 3rd to 4th September 2011. This application is being processed.
Apart from the above there were no other applications received by the current administration prior to 19 August 2011 for functions by the RCs. There were also no calls made by the PA or RCs to the AHTC to do enquiries of any sort.
Conclusion
This episode has clearly illustrated how key government agencies with intense outreach capabilities can be mobilized to advance the political interests of the ruling party, and to undermine the mandate of opposition MPs given by the electorate.
We trust Singaporeans can assess what is fair for themselves.
YAW SHIN LEONG
MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT (HOUGANG)
VICE-CHAIRMAN, ALJUNIED-HOUGANG TOWN COUNCIL
Road Safety Along Hougang Ave 7 (II) - A Simple Idea
Below is a simple idea to improve road safety along Hougang Ave 7.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Yaw Shin Leong
Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: Another Accident along Hougang Ave 7 (NE-Hougang SMC)
To: feedback@lta.gov.sg
Dear LTA (Sir/ Mdm),
This is Yaw Shin Leong, MP-Elect for Hougang SMC. I refer to the below emails cc-ed to me by 'Mr C' (Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:13 PM). It is with grave concerns that I am raising this issue again.
Please refer to our earlier communication on this matter:
http://yawshinleong.blogspot.com/2011/08/road-safety-along-hougang-ave-7.html
In the spirit of continuing the monitoring of traffic situation and to introduce suitable measures whenever necessary to improve the condition along Hougang Ave 7, I would like to suggest a simple and workable idea.
Unlike the concerns raised about noise generated via speed strips, this idea integrates available traffic speed monitoring technologies and can be operationalized in 4 simple steps.
1) Install two speed cameras (integrated to a high end computing system) along both ends of the road.
2) Calculate the average speed each vehicle took to drive down this sketch of road.
3) Install a speedometer (at both ends) to display average speed took.
4) Send warning letter/ fine to the errant driver.
For our consideration please.
Best Regards
Yaw Shin Leong
Hougang SMC MP-Elect
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mr 'C'
Sent: Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:13 PM
Cc: yawsl@wp.sg
To: feedback@lta.gov.sg
Subject: Speeding of vehicle at Hougang Ave 7 (NE-Hougang SMC)
Dear Sir,
Would like to highlight again this stretch of road had occurred many accidents, please see the attached
photos of the accident that was happened yesterday. I would really want to see LTA can do something for the Hougang
Resident’s Safety on this prone accident area. There are many joggers, students, old folks and other people using this road.
Best regards
Mr C
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mr 'C'
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:54 AM
To: feedback@lta.gov.sg
Subject: Speeding of vehicle at Hougang Ave 7 (NE-Hougang SMC)
Dear Sir
Thank you for the action taken, please also advise the Traffic Police to look for some modified cars as they always use the road for speeding (after midnight or early in the morning).
We understand that is not easy to track them as we do not know their timing, hope the traffic police able to spot them during their rounds of duty.
By the way, was a bit skeptical as you mentioned regulating strips tend to generate noise and cause disturbance , at Florida Condo, there are white strips on the road, will this affect the residents living there.
What timing does your officer conduct the observation, hope that observation is conducted at the right timing.
Thank you
'Mr C'
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Yaw Shin Leong
Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: Another Accident along Hougang Ave 7 (NE-Hougang SMC)
To: feedback@lta.gov.sg
Dear LTA (Sir/ Mdm),
This is Yaw Shin Leong, MP-Elect for Hougang SMC. I refer to the below emails cc-ed to me by 'Mr C' (Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:13 PM). It is with grave concerns that I am raising this issue again.
Please refer to our earlier communication on this matter:
http://yawshinleong.blogspot.com/2011/08/road-safety-along-hougang-ave-7.html
In the spirit of continuing the monitoring of traffic situation and to introduce suitable measures whenever necessary to improve the condition along Hougang Ave 7, I would like to suggest a simple and workable idea.
Unlike the concerns raised about noise generated via speed strips, this idea integrates available traffic speed monitoring technologies and can be operationalized in 4 simple steps.
1) Install two speed cameras (integrated to a high end computing system) along both ends of the road.
2) Calculate the average speed each vehicle took to drive down this sketch of road.
3) Install a speedometer (at both ends) to display average speed took.
4) Send warning letter/ fine to the errant driver.
For our consideration please.
Best Regards
Yaw Shin Leong
Hougang SMC MP-Elect
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mr 'C'
Sent: Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:13 PM
Cc: yawsl@wp.sg
To: feedback@lta.gov.sg
Subject: Speeding of vehicle at Hougang Ave 7 (NE-Hougang SMC)
Dear Sir,
Would like to highlight again this stretch of road had occurred many accidents, please see the attached
photos of the accident that was happened yesterday. I would really want to see LTA can do something for the Hougang
Resident’s Safety on this prone accident area. There are many joggers, students, old folks and other people using this road.
Best regards
Mr C
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mr 'C'
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:54 AM
To: feedback@lta.gov.sg
Subject: Speeding of vehicle at Hougang Ave 7 (NE-Hougang SMC)
Dear Sir
Thank you for the action taken, please also advise the Traffic Police to look for some modified cars as they always use the road for speeding (after midnight or early in the morning).
We understand that is not easy to track them as we do not know their timing, hope the traffic police able to spot them during their rounds of duty.
By the way, was a bit skeptical as you mentioned regulating strips tend to generate noise and cause disturbance , at Florida Condo, there are white strips on the road, will this affect the residents living there.
What timing does your officer conduct the observation, hope that observation is conducted at the right timing.
Thank you
'Mr C'
O $ P $ Issue (III) – Central Video Monitoring System Pilot Run
To combat the issue of illegal loan sharking activities in Hougang SMC, Shin Leong has been in close discussion with the police and members of the private sector.
The police had promised to work closely with Shin Leong to roll out specific policing actions to counter the loan sharking menace.
Concurrently Shin Leong has been talking with several private sector companies to brainstorm of ways to improve the effectiveness in video recording/ monitoring.
One private sector company offers to roll out a 24/7 Central Video monitoring system (CVMS) service for affected household for a monthly fee. Shin Leong is willing to test out the effectiveness of such a 24/7 CVMS via a pilot run for three months in Hougang SMC.
This private sector company has agreed to Shin Leong’s request and will install the CVMS system free of charge for 4 affected Hougang SMC households. Selection of the 4 affected households for the free pilot run will be based on:
1) Merits of the application
2) Severity of the situation and
3) First-come, first served basis
Additional Information about the proposed CVMS:
a) CVMS must have existing Internet access to operate
b) CVMS monitoring is triggered by motion sensor
c) Service provider will immediately inform the Police on the culprit’s descriptions and specific location.
d) Video files (via CD) will be sent to the police for investigation/ evidence purposes.
Please meet Shin Leong during his Meet the People Session (MPS) at Block 310, Hougang Ave 2 Void Deck on Wednesday nights to apply.
Kindly forward this note to any Hougang SMC resident(s) whom you think that might require this service. Thank you.
The police had promised to work closely with Shin Leong to roll out specific policing actions to counter the loan sharking menace.
Concurrently Shin Leong has been talking with several private sector companies to brainstorm of ways to improve the effectiveness in video recording/ monitoring.
One private sector company offers to roll out a 24/7 Central Video monitoring system (CVMS) service for affected household for a monthly fee. Shin Leong is willing to test out the effectiveness of such a 24/7 CVMS via a pilot run for three months in Hougang SMC.
This private sector company has agreed to Shin Leong’s request and will install the CVMS system free of charge for 4 affected Hougang SMC households. Selection of the 4 affected households for the free pilot run will be based on:
1) Merits of the application
2) Severity of the situation and
3) First-come, first served basis
Additional Information about the proposed CVMS:
a) CVMS must have existing Internet access to operate
b) CVMS monitoring is triggered by motion sensor
c) Service provider will immediately inform the Police on the culprit’s descriptions and specific location.
d) Video files (via CD) will be sent to the police for investigation/ evidence purposes.
Please meet Shin Leong during his Meet the People Session (MPS) at Block 310, Hougang Ave 2 Void Deck on Wednesday nights to apply.
Kindly forward this note to any Hougang SMC resident(s) whom you think that might require this service. Thank you.
Leasing Land for Activities in Hougang Need Not Be Difficult: Shin Leong
Read below's CNA report on Shin Leong's responses to Mr Choo's comments.
Leasing land for activities in Hougang difficult: grassroots adviser
By Hoe Yeen Nie / Imelda Saad | Posted: 23 August 2011 2233 hrs
SINGAPORE: The adviser to the Hougang grassroots organisations, Desmond Choo, shared with the media some difficulties faced by grassroots volunteers there in leasing land managed by the town council of Hougang.
He is a member of the People's Action Party and had lost to the Workers' Party MP Yaw Shin Leong at the recent General Election.
Mr Choo said the scope of activities organised by grassroots volunteers have been curtailed since 1991, when Hougang came under the Workers' Party.
Volunteers have told him that they usually hold events at the Residents' Committee (RC) Centres and Community Clubs, which have smaller capacities. This is because applications for sites under the management of Hougang's town council, such as open fields, were often unsuccessful.
Mr Choo said: "(The volunteers) said sometimes they don't get approval to do so, and sometimes they don't get responses. Certainly, we have to expect that Hougang town council manages things from a whole-of-estate perspective, because there are different residents' needs to manage.
"But then they told me there are times whereby (they did not get approval for) the premises they had requested for...but at the (time of the) event, the [premises were not being used]."
Mr Daniel Neo, Chairman of the Hougang Zone 1 Residents' Committee, cited a case in December 2004 where an application to hold a joint Hari Raya-Christmas activity for residents at a void deck was turned down. The only explanation he received, "was that since 2002, they ceased to give these permits."
Mr Neo said: "We were disappointed, but we respect the town council's decision because they run the place."
As an alternative, activities were also sometimes held at other locations such as the Sunlove Home for the elderly and schools.
Mr Choo said he is in talks with the People's Association (PA) to lease six sites currently under the management of the Aljunied-Hougang Town Council and expects to conclude the talks in a few weeks. These are located near the six RC centres in Hougang constituency.
He hopes he can further his outreach by holding a bigger variety of events, such as basketball tournaments, and drumming activities. However, he rejected suggestions that he would benefit politically.
He also said he would be open to allowing MPs from the Workers' Party to attend the events, if they do so in their personal capacities.
Responding to Mr Choo's comments, Hougang MP Yaw Shin Leong has offered to meet Mr Choo to resolve difficulties residents may have in securing public sites to organise community events there.
Mr Yaw said the interests of Hougang residents must always come first and added that the more activities residents can participate in, be it organised by the PA or the Workers' Party, the better it will be.
Mr Yaw said the fact that Mr Choo is presently in discussions with PA to acquire six sites within Hougang for the purpose of organising grassroots and community events, showed that the HDB, as part of the government machinery, is "abusing its power as land owner of common property in HDB estates to help PA to achieve their political objectives."
"If the HDB is to permit Mr Choo and the PA to acquire the six sites in Hougang, it will merely confirm that HDB is abusing its power as land owner of common property in HDB estates to help PA achieve their politically motivated objectives." he said.
He added: "The PA is leveraging on HDB to enable PAP candidates who lost at the last elections to re-emerge at community events as advisers to PA grassroots organisations. The move to let PA control the sites previously managed by the town council would give PAP candidates a ground advantage and permanent presence, in advance preparation for the next elections.
"Contrast the above to opposition candidates who lost at general elections but will never ever have similar grassroots platforms to leverage upon, in preparations for their next elections."
"For the sake of Singapore, I urge both the PA and HDB to stop all these politically motivated bickering. If Mr Choo or his grassroots leaders are facing difficulties in organising activities in Hougang, please do let me know. I will be happy to sit down with them over coffee to resolve their difficulties," said Mr Yaw.
-CNA/ac
Leasing land for activities in Hougang difficult: grassroots adviser
By Hoe Yeen Nie / Imelda Saad | Posted: 23 August 2011 2233 hrs
SINGAPORE: The adviser to the Hougang grassroots organisations, Desmond Choo, shared with the media some difficulties faced by grassroots volunteers there in leasing land managed by the town council of Hougang.
He is a member of the People's Action Party and had lost to the Workers' Party MP Yaw Shin Leong at the recent General Election.
Mr Choo said the scope of activities organised by grassroots volunteers have been curtailed since 1991, when Hougang came under the Workers' Party.
Volunteers have told him that they usually hold events at the Residents' Committee (RC) Centres and Community Clubs, which have smaller capacities. This is because applications for sites under the management of Hougang's town council, such as open fields, were often unsuccessful.
Mr Choo said: "(The volunteers) said sometimes they don't get approval to do so, and sometimes they don't get responses. Certainly, we have to expect that Hougang town council manages things from a whole-of-estate perspective, because there are different residents' needs to manage.
"But then they told me there are times whereby (they did not get approval for) the premises they had requested for...but at the (time of the) event, the [premises were not being used]."
Mr Daniel Neo, Chairman of the Hougang Zone 1 Residents' Committee, cited a case in December 2004 where an application to hold a joint Hari Raya-Christmas activity for residents at a void deck was turned down. The only explanation he received, "was that since 2002, they ceased to give these permits."
Mr Neo said: "We were disappointed, but we respect the town council's decision because they run the place."
As an alternative, activities were also sometimes held at other locations such as the Sunlove Home for the elderly and schools.
Mr Choo said he is in talks with the People's Association (PA) to lease six sites currently under the management of the Aljunied-Hougang Town Council and expects to conclude the talks in a few weeks. These are located near the six RC centres in Hougang constituency.
He hopes he can further his outreach by holding a bigger variety of events, such as basketball tournaments, and drumming activities. However, he rejected suggestions that he would benefit politically.
He also said he would be open to allowing MPs from the Workers' Party to attend the events, if they do so in their personal capacities.
Responding to Mr Choo's comments, Hougang MP Yaw Shin Leong has offered to meet Mr Choo to resolve difficulties residents may have in securing public sites to organise community events there.
Mr Yaw said the interests of Hougang residents must always come first and added that the more activities residents can participate in, be it organised by the PA or the Workers' Party, the better it will be.
Mr Yaw said the fact that Mr Choo is presently in discussions with PA to acquire six sites within Hougang for the purpose of organising grassroots and community events, showed that the HDB, as part of the government machinery, is "abusing its power as land owner of common property in HDB estates to help PA to achieve their political objectives."
"If the HDB is to permit Mr Choo and the PA to acquire the six sites in Hougang, it will merely confirm that HDB is abusing its power as land owner of common property in HDB estates to help PA achieve their politically motivated objectives." he said.
He added: "The PA is leveraging on HDB to enable PAP candidates who lost at the last elections to re-emerge at community events as advisers to PA grassroots organisations. The move to let PA control the sites previously managed by the town council would give PAP candidates a ground advantage and permanent presence, in advance preparation for the next elections.
"Contrast the above to opposition candidates who lost at general elections but will never ever have similar grassroots platforms to leverage upon, in preparations for their next elections."
"For the sake of Singapore, I urge both the PA and HDB to stop all these politically motivated bickering. If Mr Choo or his grassroots leaders are facing difficulties in organising activities in Hougang, please do let me know. I will be happy to sit down with them over coffee to resolve their difficulties," said Mr Yaw.
-CNA/ac
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Intensive Free Mathematics Tuition
To assist Hougang SMC students who need help in Mathematics for the upcoming O-Levels examinations, volunteers of HGCC (Hougang Constituency Committee) will be conducting intensive Mathematics tuition classes from 7.30pm to 9.30pm on the following dates (Fridays):
1) 02nd September 2011
2) 09th September 2011
3) 16th September 2011
4) 23rd September 2011
5) 30th September 2011
6) 07th October 2011
7) 14th October 2011
8) 21st October 2011
Tuition lessons will be for 2 hours each class and our tutor/s can have up to a maximum of 15 students each class. The focus is on getting each student to be exam-smart and the emphasis will be in getting students to practice past examination papers.
The location will be in the conference room of Block 701 Hougang Ave 2 #01-01 (Aljunied-Hougang Town Council). Please register today via hgcc@wp.sg if you are interested.
Kindly forward this message to any student (living in Hougang SMC) who requires assistance.
Thank you.
Monday, August 22, 2011
Media Release on Use of Public Sites at Aljunied GRC
This release seeks to enlighten the public about what transpired in the weeks after the May General Election, which has led to the current controversy about use of public spaces by residents of Aljunied GRC to organise events.
Background Facts
On 21 June 2011, the interim Secretary of Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) received an email from the Housing and Development Board (HDB) entitled: “Sites Excluded from the Management of Aljunied-Hougang Town Council”. The email attached a list of sites to be excluded from AHTC management, including 26 sites commonly used for community activities which had previously been managed by the former Aljunied Town Council. No background nor rationale was given for the decision.
Upon further and repeated enquiries from AHTC, HDB revealed on 13 July 2011 that these sites had been leased to the People’s Association (PA), in 2 tranches – on 27 May 2011 and 13 June 2011. The AHTC had thus been informed retrospectively of this decision, which to our knowledge has not been published anywhere.
A check on the sites, which were part of the common property managed by the former Aljunied Town Council but now leased to PA, showed that many of them are strategically located, being hard courts or amphitheatres highly suitable for organising social activities. We were puzzled about the intention behind the move, which occurred before the new management took over the estate. We are left to conclude that the decision by the HDB to shift management of these common properties from the Town Council to the PA was precipitated by the victory of the Workers’ Party in Aljunied GRC in the General Elections.
In order not to subject residents to unnecessary inconvenience and confusion, I sought a meeting with the HDB for clarification, and on 13 July 2011 conveyed to the HDB AHTC’s willingness to discuss the matter further with the PA, to explore joint use of the excluded sites. HDB then followed up with the PA. In an email to me dated 15 Aug 2011, the PA indicated that “booking by WP will not be allowed”, which we assume includes bookings for activities organised by WP MPs for residents.
Effect of HDB’s Decision as Landowner
During the weeks in July / early August leading to the lunar Seventh Month festivities, residents of Paya Lebar Division gave feedback that they were informed by the PA grassroots organisations to apply for the use of the said sites to the Paya Lebar Citizens Consultative Committee (CCC) instead of to the Town Council as was the previous practice. We also received feedback that those who had applied to the CCC for the permits were told verbally that they could not invite the elected WP MP or they would risk their applications being turned down in subsequent years.
Residents have told us that they are confused by the new requirements of the CCC and annoyed by the intense politicking by the PA grassroots organizations. They felt torn and in an emotional dilemma.
Political Implications
It appears to us that the unilateral decision by the HDB to lease these sites to the PA and to have them excluded from common property under the management of AHTC without any consultation with the AHTC or its elected members is politically motivated and an abuse of power.
First, the HDB as part of the government machinery is abusing its power as land owner of common property in HDB estates to help PA to achieve the political objectives of a) preventing elected MPs from holding activities at the excluded sites which are strategically located and convenient to residents; and b) curtailing the ground presence of the elected MPs, by warning the residents that their applications for events at those sites may not be approved in subsequent years if WP MPs were invited.
Secondly, the PA, a statutory board funded by tax payers’ money and chaired by the Prime Minister, appears to capitalize on its close connection with the government to serve the political interests of the ruling party.
The PA is leveraging on HDB to enable PAP candidates who lost at the last elections to re-emerge at community events as “advisors” to PA grassroots organizations. The move to let PA control the sites previously managed by the Town Council would give PAP candidates a ground advantage and permanent presence, in advance preparation for the next elections.
Conclusion
The PM has just called for political harmony and national solidarity in Singapore, and said that “we must have a harmonious political system where we make important decisions in the best interests of Singapore and Singaporeans.”
Regrettably, there appears to be a dissonance between the language of national unity employed by the Prime Minister and the actions of the HDB and PA in Aljunied GRC.
SYLVIA LIM
CHAIRMAN,
WORKERS’ PARTY AND ALJUNIED-HOUGANG TOWN COUNCIL
Background Facts
On 21 June 2011, the interim Secretary of Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) received an email from the Housing and Development Board (HDB) entitled: “Sites Excluded from the Management of Aljunied-Hougang Town Council”. The email attached a list of sites to be excluded from AHTC management, including 26 sites commonly used for community activities which had previously been managed by the former Aljunied Town Council. No background nor rationale was given for the decision.
Upon further and repeated enquiries from AHTC, HDB revealed on 13 July 2011 that these sites had been leased to the People’s Association (PA), in 2 tranches – on 27 May 2011 and 13 June 2011. The AHTC had thus been informed retrospectively of this decision, which to our knowledge has not been published anywhere.
A check on the sites, which were part of the common property managed by the former Aljunied Town Council but now leased to PA, showed that many of them are strategically located, being hard courts or amphitheatres highly suitable for organising social activities. We were puzzled about the intention behind the move, which occurred before the new management took over the estate. We are left to conclude that the decision by the HDB to shift management of these common properties from the Town Council to the PA was precipitated by the victory of the Workers’ Party in Aljunied GRC in the General Elections.
In order not to subject residents to unnecessary inconvenience and confusion, I sought a meeting with the HDB for clarification, and on 13 July 2011 conveyed to the HDB AHTC’s willingness to discuss the matter further with the PA, to explore joint use of the excluded sites. HDB then followed up with the PA. In an email to me dated 15 Aug 2011, the PA indicated that “booking by WP will not be allowed”, which we assume includes bookings for activities organised by WP MPs for residents.
Effect of HDB’s Decision as Landowner
During the weeks in July / early August leading to the lunar Seventh Month festivities, residents of Paya Lebar Division gave feedback that they were informed by the PA grassroots organisations to apply for the use of the said sites to the Paya Lebar Citizens Consultative Committee (CCC) instead of to the Town Council as was the previous practice. We also received feedback that those who had applied to the CCC for the permits were told verbally that they could not invite the elected WP MP or they would risk their applications being turned down in subsequent years.
Residents have told us that they are confused by the new requirements of the CCC and annoyed by the intense politicking by the PA grassroots organizations. They felt torn and in an emotional dilemma.
Political Implications
It appears to us that the unilateral decision by the HDB to lease these sites to the PA and to have them excluded from common property under the management of AHTC without any consultation with the AHTC or its elected members is politically motivated and an abuse of power.
First, the HDB as part of the government machinery is abusing its power as land owner of common property in HDB estates to help PA to achieve the political objectives of a) preventing elected MPs from holding activities at the excluded sites which are strategically located and convenient to residents; and b) curtailing the ground presence of the elected MPs, by warning the residents that their applications for events at those sites may not be approved in subsequent years if WP MPs were invited.
Secondly, the PA, a statutory board funded by tax payers’ money and chaired by the Prime Minister, appears to capitalize on its close connection with the government to serve the political interests of the ruling party.
The PA is leveraging on HDB to enable PAP candidates who lost at the last elections to re-emerge at community events as “advisors” to PA grassroots organizations. The move to let PA control the sites previously managed by the Town Council would give PAP candidates a ground advantage and permanent presence, in advance preparation for the next elections.
Conclusion
The PM has just called for political harmony and national solidarity in Singapore, and said that “we must have a harmonious political system where we make important decisions in the best interests of Singapore and Singaporeans.”
Regrettably, there appears to be a dissonance between the language of national unity employed by the Prime Minister and the actions of the HDB and PA in Aljunied GRC.
SYLVIA LIM
CHAIRMAN,
WORKERS’ PARTY AND ALJUNIED-HOUGANG TOWN COUNCIL
Free OpenNet Installation After Lapse Of Offer?
Below is an email exchange between the 'L' Family & OpenNet regarding a situation over free installation. With permission from Mr 'L', I am reproducing the contents for our reading.
Legally OpenNet has gotten itself covered. However do you think OpenNet/ IDA has an obligation to ensure that similarly affected families (such as the 'L' Family) should not be denied of free OpenNet installations?
Best Regards
Shin Leong
-----
Dear OpenNet,
We had recently took ownership of the unit at Hougang Ave 5 and understand that the free installation has been completed.
The flat had been vacant since Dec 2008. Hence we seek your kind understanding if you could make arrangement to provide for free opennet optical fibre installation for our unit.
Attached herewith the letter from HDB. Kindly connected myself at XXXXXXXX or Mr ABC at XXXXXXXX should you require further information.
Best regards,
Mrs L
-------
Dear Mrs L,
We refer to your request for free installation of the optical fibre after the lapse of the offer. We regret to inform you that we are unable to offer free installation to households after the installation period.
OpenNet is a commercial company. It had bidded for and secured the NG NBN project on commercial terms. As part of its terms, OpenNet offers home owners a free connection during a specific period. The offer lapses if this decision is not made within the specified period.
OpenNet will upon request make the connection after this period but will have to call in its contractors to carry out the task. There is a cost to this which OpenNet will have to recover as part of its commercial terms for the NG NBN project.
Best Regards,
OpenNet
Legally OpenNet has gotten itself covered. However do you think OpenNet/ IDA has an obligation to ensure that similarly affected families (such as the 'L' Family) should not be denied of free OpenNet installations?
Best Regards
Shin Leong
-----
Dear OpenNet,
We had recently took ownership of the unit at Hougang Ave 5 and understand that the free installation has been completed.
The flat had been vacant since Dec 2008. Hence we seek your kind understanding if you could make arrangement to provide for free opennet optical fibre installation for our unit.
Attached herewith the letter from HDB. Kindly connected myself at XXXXXXXX or Mr ABC at XXXXXXXX should you require further information.
Best regards,
Mrs L
-------
Dear Mrs L,
We refer to your request for free installation of the optical fibre after the lapse of the offer. We regret to inform you that we are unable to offer free installation to households after the installation period.
OpenNet is a commercial company. It had bidded for and secured the NG NBN project on commercial terms. As part of its terms, OpenNet offers home owners a free connection during a specific period. The offer lapses if this decision is not made within the specified period.
OpenNet will upon request make the connection after this period but will have to call in its contractors to carry out the task. There is a cost to this which OpenNet will have to recover as part of its commercial terms for the NG NBN project.
Best Regards,
OpenNet
Sunday, August 21, 2011
Tour de Aljunied GRC
This morning 5 friends gathered for cycling trip. The adventure was to cycle around the circumference of Aljunied GRC and to measure via GPS, a rough distance guesstimate of Aljunied GRC's boundaries.
We found out that the circumference of Aljunied GRC is guesstimated to be 34.33km (+/-) as we were unable to measure certain sketches on wheels (Eg: Expressways). The entire adventure took us 4 hours 16 minutes, as several pit stops were made to hydrate ourselves and to interact with residents.
The 5 friends had tremendous fun, despite slight muscular cramps, sun burns and severe perspirations!
Comments on Managing Constituents
Below is a raw translation of Shin Leong's comments in ZB Sunday (21/08/2011) Page 10:
During a recent interview, Hougang SMC Member of Parliament, WP Treasurer Yaw Shin Leong shared that since he took charge of Hougang SMC's Meet The People Session (MPS) in May 2011, he has yet to encounter residents who are excessively impolite.
However Shin Leong emphasized that he will not blame the government (without basis) over its policies & discourses whenever a resident faced problems, just for the purpose of winning over that resident.
Yaw Shin Leong said that, while he has opinions over various aspects of policy matters, still he is of the view that some policies are necessary. When certain residents requested for special exemption from a prevailing policy, he will do his best to explain to them why that particular policy is necessary and concurrently analyze the probability for a successful appeal.
Yaw Shin Leong pointed out that in the course of dealing with various governmental departments, he find that governmental departments which he has encountered thus far, are objective, professional and will not give unequal treatment to him because he is an opposition MP.
Celebrating National Day With Uncle Chiam See Tong
Last night I joined SPP in their National Day Celebration Dinner after attending a grassroots constituency function in Hougang. Marking Singapore’s 46th national day together with fellow political opposition comrades, particularly Uncle Chiam See Tong, was a great honor for me.
I had always held immense respect for Uncle Chiam. He was also one of my first political mentors. Uncle Chiam See Tong’s political convictions, silent struggles and significant contributions in nation building vis-à-vis the building up of Singapore’s opposition movement have touched the hearts of many.
For instance, Uncle Chiam’s stepping out of Potong Pasir SMC to lead a team to contest in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC epitomized political courage and leadership. This had earned the respect of many Singaporeans despite the fact that his team did not manage to win the GRC.
Uncle Chiam’s efforts to the nation building of Singapore will go down in our nation’s history as one of the key contributors to Singapore’s political development. If we talk about National Day’s awards for this man’s contributions to our nation, Uncle Chiam certainly deserves dozens of those PBMs or BBMs titles!
More importantly, Uncle Chiam’s persevering spirit in his relentless fight for a more balanced Singapore had inspired a new generation of political activists to rise up. Despite his current health constraints, Uncle Chiam is mentally alert. Without titles or medals, he continues to press on this fight.
I left the dinner feeling warm, and touched by Uncle Chiam’s resilience spirit yet again.
Friday, August 19, 2011
Opposition Voices Growing in Singapore’s ‘New Normal’ – The Irrawaddy
By SIMON ROUGHNEEN
SINGAPORE—Three months after Singaporeans went to the polls in what have been described as landmark parliamentary elections, campaigning is heating up—by local standards—for the Aug. 27 presidential vote.As announced on Wednesday, four candidates are running on non-party tickets, and the election appears to be more hotly contested than usual, partly due to the outcome of the parliamentary vote.
Singaporeans—in one electoral district at least, where the opposition took five out of its six seats—countered the stereotype that they are apolitical citizens mostly motivated by economic concerns. This is what local pundits are calling the “new normal” in Singaporean politics—an as-yet-untested opposition presence in parliament, and the flowering of critical voices in society.
In the May 7 contest the incumbent People's Action Party (PAP) took 81 out of 87 available seats, a landslide by any standards. However Singapore's first-past-the-post electoral system meant that this was garnered with just 60 percent of the popular vote. The opposition Workers Party had its best ever showing, taking almost 13 percent of the popular vote, though this translated into just six seats. The National Solidarity Party took 12 percent of the vote, but this was not enough to win any parliamentary seats.
Speaking to The Irrawaddy earlier this week in his Hougang constituency, Workers Party MP Yaw Shin Leong said his party be a constructive and critical opposition. However, he conceded that despite the rise of online media such as Temasek Review and The Online Citizen—which unlike TV and print media are not linked to the PAP—“the odds are stacked against us.”
That said, the “new normal” is seemingly having an impact on the lower-stakes presidential race. On Thursday, in an occurrence that might be dismissed as innocuous elsewhere, headlines were made in Singapore's largely state-run media as candidate Dr. Tony Tan was jeered onstage during a speech carried live on TV.
His campaign team blamed supporters of rival Tan Jee Say, leading Tan—a former deputy prime minister and one-time deputy chairman of the the government's sovereign wealth fund—to tell the media afterward: “I think it is deeply disappointing to have people who will not even listen. I hope that during this campaign, Singaporeans will listen to views of all the candidates.”
Tan is regarded as close to the ruling PAP, which if not quite reeling, appeared to be chastened somewhat by the 6.5 percent swing to the opposition in the parliamentary vote. Two of the other four candidates are also affiliated, in the past at least to the PAP, with Tan Jee Say running after a failed bid for a parliamentary seat with the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), which is not represented in parliament.
Singapore's first—and to date sole—presidential vote was in 1993, and outgoing President S.R. Nathan was returned unopposed in 1999 and 2005.
Reacting to the election result at the time, PAP leaders acknowledged that they would have to listen to voters' concerns more intently in future, with some analysts suggesting that a further 10 percent swing to the opposition would see the PAP out of office for the first time in Singapore's history.
Ahead of the opening of the newly elected parliament, the prime minister used his National Day speech last Sunday night to counter-attack, pledging more university places and promising more accessible health care and housing for a wider income bracket in the country's means-tested system.
His speech echoed some of the themes of the parliamentary campaign, which saw sharp divisions and debate over hot-button issues such as immigration, living costs, health care and housing. Seeking to remind Singaporeans of the trade and investment hub's vulnerability to global economic cycles, he made mention of the post-2008 economic downturn that Singapore hard.
“We have come through the worst storm ever—and Singapore is better,” he quipped.
After a rocky 2009, Singapore's economy rebounded strongly in 2010, posting 14 percent growth and bucking trend in Europe, North America and Japan. An increasingly strong currency now being touted as “a haven” in financial circles, in a country with a GDP per capita of over US $42,000.
Asked about the opposition's take on the prime minister's speech, Yaw Shin Leong acknowledged, “Let's be fair, they have been given a mandate, and we will not criticize policy for the sake of it.
“But we will scrutinize their proposals and will try to leverage the six (eight) seats we have to do out best for Singapore, which means being a tough opposition.”
--------
You may read the original article below:
http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=21923
http://www.simonroughneen.com/politics-government/opposition-voices-growing-in-singapores-new-normal-the-irrawaddy/#more-5043
SINGAPORE—Three months after Singaporeans went to the polls in what have been described as landmark parliamentary elections, campaigning is heating up—by local standards—for the Aug. 27 presidential vote.As announced on Wednesday, four candidates are running on non-party tickets, and the election appears to be more hotly contested than usual, partly due to the outcome of the parliamentary vote.
Singaporeans—in one electoral district at least, where the opposition took five out of its six seats—countered the stereotype that they are apolitical citizens mostly motivated by economic concerns. This is what local pundits are calling the “new normal” in Singaporean politics—an as-yet-untested opposition presence in parliament, and the flowering of critical voices in society.
In the May 7 contest the incumbent People's Action Party (PAP) took 81 out of 87 available seats, a landslide by any standards. However Singapore's first-past-the-post electoral system meant that this was garnered with just 60 percent of the popular vote. The opposition Workers Party had its best ever showing, taking almost 13 percent of the popular vote, though this translated into just six seats. The National Solidarity Party took 12 percent of the vote, but this was not enough to win any parliamentary seats.
Speaking to The Irrawaddy earlier this week in his Hougang constituency, Workers Party MP Yaw Shin Leong said his party be a constructive and critical opposition. However, he conceded that despite the rise of online media such as Temasek Review and The Online Citizen—which unlike TV and print media are not linked to the PAP—“the odds are stacked against us.”
That said, the “new normal” is seemingly having an impact on the lower-stakes presidential race. On Thursday, in an occurrence that might be dismissed as innocuous elsewhere, headlines were made in Singapore's largely state-run media as candidate Dr. Tony Tan was jeered onstage during a speech carried live on TV.
His campaign team blamed supporters of rival Tan Jee Say, leading Tan—a former deputy prime minister and one-time deputy chairman of the the government's sovereign wealth fund—to tell the media afterward: “I think it is deeply disappointing to have people who will not even listen. I hope that during this campaign, Singaporeans will listen to views of all the candidates.”
Tan is regarded as close to the ruling PAP, which if not quite reeling, appeared to be chastened somewhat by the 6.5 percent swing to the opposition in the parliamentary vote. Two of the other four candidates are also affiliated, in the past at least to the PAP, with Tan Jee Say running after a failed bid for a parliamentary seat with the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), which is not represented in parliament.
Singapore's first—and to date sole—presidential vote was in 1993, and outgoing President S.R. Nathan was returned unopposed in 1999 and 2005.
Reacting to the election result at the time, PAP leaders acknowledged that they would have to listen to voters' concerns more intently in future, with some analysts suggesting that a further 10 percent swing to the opposition would see the PAP out of office for the first time in Singapore's history.
Ahead of the opening of the newly elected parliament, the prime minister used his National Day speech last Sunday night to counter-attack, pledging more university places and promising more accessible health care and housing for a wider income bracket in the country's means-tested system.
His speech echoed some of the themes of the parliamentary campaign, which saw sharp divisions and debate over hot-button issues such as immigration, living costs, health care and housing. Seeking to remind Singaporeans of the trade and investment hub's vulnerability to global economic cycles, he made mention of the post-2008 economic downturn that Singapore hard.
“We have come through the worst storm ever—and Singapore is better,” he quipped.
After a rocky 2009, Singapore's economy rebounded strongly in 2010, posting 14 percent growth and bucking trend in Europe, North America and Japan. An increasingly strong currency now being touted as “a haven” in financial circles, in a country with a GDP per capita of over US $42,000.
Asked about the opposition's take on the prime minister's speech, Yaw Shin Leong acknowledged, “Let's be fair, they have been given a mandate, and we will not criticize policy for the sake of it.
“But we will scrutinize their proposals and will try to leverage the six (eight) seats we have to do out best for Singapore, which means being a tough opposition.”
--------
You may read the original article below:
http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=21923
http://www.simonroughneen.com/politics-government/opposition-voices-growing-in-singapores-new-normal-the-irrawaddy/#more-5043
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
The Experiences Of A Tax Payer
Mr C & his family live in an Executive Condominium in Hougang SMC. He shared with me that he has been paying an excess of 6% property tax per annum since 2000. According to him:
It was only a few months ago when Singapore’s property tax rate of 4% applies for owner occupied unit. It was only with increasingly higher annual value (AV) and property tax which we had been paying at 10% AV that we started to question and found out that we had been paying the excess 6% since year 2000.
As first time private (actually not really private as it's an EC) home owners who had upgraded from a resale HDB flat, we were aware of certain restrictions on EC owners. As busy working class people, we had dutifully settled all the property tax bills which came to us, including on occasions when there were additional taxes payable due to the revised higher annual value. Upon finding out the mistake, we notified IRAS that we had been over-charged, and were promptly refunded (more than $6300) the excess property tax paid for years of assessment 2011 back to 2006.
Despite repeated requests to meet with IRAS officer and written appeals, IRAS has given us standard replies that the reason for rejecting our claims for the years prior to 2006 was because it was "more than 6 years ago".
If we had not been occupying our unit, and had rented it out, we would have declared rental income which would then have been taxable, and in which case fair to be charged property tax at 10%. However, given the limitations, we have been here since day 1 as occupiers ourselves. Our address on our NRICs had been updated as such since we first moved in, which we are certain the agency could easily verify. As this is the only property we have had, we would think that it is fair for IRAS to automatically accord us the 4% tax rate.
We have since checked with 5 other friends and relatives who are owner-occupiers, and discovered that 2 of them had actually paid the 10% tax rate. While 1 of them managed to recover the full refund as the claims were within the first 6 years, the other one has been staying in his landed property for 13 years and has received similar standard reply from IRAs ie refundable only if it's within preceding 6 years.
It's unfair for IRAS to ignore the fact that there are possibly many such 'ignorant' tax payers out there, especially in our case as EC owner with all the restrictions. We believe they would have an archive of our past records as well to process a refund.
Do you think IRAS has been fair to Mr C & his family?
It was only a few months ago when Singapore’s property tax rate of 4% applies for owner occupied unit. It was only with increasingly higher annual value (AV) and property tax which we had been paying at 10% AV that we started to question and found out that we had been paying the excess 6% since year 2000.
As first time private (actually not really private as it's an EC) home owners who had upgraded from a resale HDB flat, we were aware of certain restrictions on EC owners. As busy working class people, we had dutifully settled all the property tax bills which came to us, including on occasions when there were additional taxes payable due to the revised higher annual value. Upon finding out the mistake, we notified IRAS that we had been over-charged, and were promptly refunded (more than $6300) the excess property tax paid for years of assessment 2011 back to 2006.
Despite repeated requests to meet with IRAS officer and written appeals, IRAS has given us standard replies that the reason for rejecting our claims for the years prior to 2006 was because it was "more than 6 years ago".
If we had not been occupying our unit, and had rented it out, we would have declared rental income which would then have been taxable, and in which case fair to be charged property tax at 10%. However, given the limitations, we have been here since day 1 as occupiers ourselves. Our address on our NRICs had been updated as such since we first moved in, which we are certain the agency could easily verify. As this is the only property we have had, we would think that it is fair for IRAS to automatically accord us the 4% tax rate.
We have since checked with 5 other friends and relatives who are owner-occupiers, and discovered that 2 of them had actually paid the 10% tax rate. While 1 of them managed to recover the full refund as the claims were within the first 6 years, the other one has been staying in his landed property for 13 years and has received similar standard reply from IRAs ie refundable only if it's within preceding 6 years.
It's unfair for IRAS to ignore the fact that there are possibly many such 'ignorant' tax payers out there, especially in our case as EC owner with all the restrictions. We believe they would have an archive of our past records as well to process a refund.
Do you think IRAS has been fair to Mr C & his family?
Monday, August 15, 2011
Our Hougang Volunteers
What motivates a Hougang volunteer to spend an entire evening amongst fellow team mates in preparation for upcoming Hougang festive events? Let’s see what respective Hougang volunteers have to say:
S: For the people of Hougang
L: For my team mates
X: For Hougang SMC
P: For Hougang residents
B: For comradeship
C: For fellow Hougang constituents
E: If we don’t do it. Who will do it?
Y: For the Hougang community
This is indeed the Hougang Spirit! Volunteers still happily at work at 2305 hours! Will you join us? Email us at hgcc@wp.sg today :)
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Help Needed For Cherry Nursing Home
This morning, Shin Leong conducted a routine walkabout with his volunteers. They also visited the elderly patients living in Cherry Nursing Home and chatted with some of them. It is a small little nursing home in a relatively cramped setting.
Several of the elderly patients are having various stages of dementia and are not coherent with their conversations. Some of the patients are bed-ridden and have to be fed via feeding tubes. Later in the afternoon, Shin Leong contacted one of the owners of Cherry Nursing Home to better understand the needs of the Nursing Home.
The owner Mrs Choo shared with Shin Leong that Cherry Nursing Home is relatively crowded. She shared that the home is in the midst of seeking out a new permanent home (a small building etc) or to set up a new branch to house the existing patients & waiting list of future patients.
Mrs Choo highlighted that the present address is on a two year commercial tendency and it will be good if Cherry Nursing Home can have a more permanent home. She hopes to receive assistance from either governmental agencies with old building to let or kindred souls to link her up with contacts with an affordable building to let for the nursing home.
If you know of someone who can assist Cherry Nursing Home, please email Shin Leong at shinleong.yaw@wp.sg or contact Mrs Choo directly at 63822680. Thank you.
Tuesday, August 09, 2011
Majulah Singapura! HGCC National Day Picnic with volunteers and residents
To celebrate our Nation’s 46th birthday, Hougang Constituency Committee (HGCC) organized a National Day picnic with some volunteers and residents at Punggol Park.
It was a short get-together, with some 40 over friends of HGCC. All of us get to pen our thoughts and wishes for Singapore on a beautifully painted canvas board.
Giving a short speech before the lunch commenced, Shin Leong shared that this year’s theme for NDP, the Singapore Spirit. The Hougang Spirit encapsulates the essence of the Singapore Spirit. This Hougang Spirit is whereby each Hougang volunteer contributes his part towards community bonding & building.
For example, Shin Leong shared that everyday, Uncle Tan & his team (not his real name), would be at the void deck of Blk 24 for the food distribution to the welfare needy residents. This persevering spirit to serve the residents is something we appreciate and look up to.
Another residents group that Shin Leong pointed out was an independent grassroots leader of a particular neighbourhood cluster in Hougang, Uncle ‘Loh’. His grassroots volunteers were mobilized to sell tickets, and help out for the various events organized by HGCC for the past 20 years. Without any recognition medals or titles, they served perseveringly without complaint.
Similarly the idea of the Singapore Spirit is a collective spirit, whereby each and every Singaporean contributing his part towards nation building, starting at the community and constituency levels.
Shin Leong also recognized the HGCC committee and volunteers who worked behind the scene to organize each event for HGCC, including this National Day picnic. The hard work and efforts behind the scene is to serve the residents and the people of Singapore.
This is the Singapore Spirit that we should emulate.
Happy Birthday Singapore! May You be blessed with Peace, Progress and Prosperity!
Monday, August 08, 2011
National Day Statement 2011 – Honouring Our First Generation
Forty-six years is hardly a significant span of time. Yet in just this short period, Singapore has transformed from a young nation coping with the challenges of independence, to a developed economy and a vibrant metropolis.
We can now marvel at our many accomplishments and accolades, and celebrate our diversity and harmony. Our country’s success is for all Singaporeans to share and celebrate. We have arrived at where we are today through the toil of many generations of Singaporeans, rich and poor, professionals and labourers, of all races and national origins.
This National Day, the Workers’ Party wishes to pay a special tribute to the first generation of Singaporeans who struggled to build our nation during the early decades of independence. They are now our parents and grandparents, uncles and aunts; the elderly cleaners; the retired civil servants and teachers; the first National Servicemen.
This generation embodies the true Singapore spirit—the determination to work hard, overcome the odds and carve out a better life for their children. They serve as an shining example for many future generations to follow.
History may only remember the kings and not the soldiers, but let us never forget the contributions of the first generation of Singaporeans. More than anyone else, they deserve to enjoy the fruits of our nation’s success.
The men and women in our pioneer generation have borne society’s burdens for the past 46 years and more. They gave the best years of their lives to our nation. Our nation must now give its best in return to them. Even as we strive for progress and economic efficiency, our nation has an obligation to help this generation of Singaporeans live their latter years in dignity, comfort and fulfilment; free from worry and fear for lack of provision.
As we celebrate our 46th National Day, the Workers’ Party would like to express our heartfelt thanks to all Singaporeans, especially our pioneer generation, for their sacrifices, hard work and contributions to building our nation to what it is today.
The Workers’ Party wishes all Singaporeans—including those living abroad—a very Happy 46th National Day.
SYLVIA LIM
Chairman, Workers’ Party and Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC
8 August 2011
We can now marvel at our many accomplishments and accolades, and celebrate our diversity and harmony. Our country’s success is for all Singaporeans to share and celebrate. We have arrived at where we are today through the toil of many generations of Singaporeans, rich and poor, professionals and labourers, of all races and national origins.
This National Day, the Workers’ Party wishes to pay a special tribute to the first generation of Singaporeans who struggled to build our nation during the early decades of independence. They are now our parents and grandparents, uncles and aunts; the elderly cleaners; the retired civil servants and teachers; the first National Servicemen.
This generation embodies the true Singapore spirit—the determination to work hard, overcome the odds and carve out a better life for their children. They serve as an shining example for many future generations to follow.
History may only remember the kings and not the soldiers, but let us never forget the contributions of the first generation of Singaporeans. More than anyone else, they deserve to enjoy the fruits of our nation’s success.
The men and women in our pioneer generation have borne society’s burdens for the past 46 years and more. They gave the best years of their lives to our nation. Our nation must now give its best in return to them. Even as we strive for progress and economic efficiency, our nation has an obligation to help this generation of Singaporeans live their latter years in dignity, comfort and fulfilment; free from worry and fear for lack of provision.
As we celebrate our 46th National Day, the Workers’ Party would like to express our heartfelt thanks to all Singaporeans, especially our pioneer generation, for their sacrifices, hard work and contributions to building our nation to what it is today.
The Workers’ Party wishes all Singaporeans—including those living abroad—a very Happy 46th National Day.
SYLVIA LIM
Chairman, Workers’ Party and Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC
8 August 2011
The O $ P $ Issue (II)
Below contains extract of an email from an exasperated innocent Hougang constituent facing harassments from loan sharks. This constituent has brought up some valid points. With the constituent’s permission, the contents are reproduced here for our reading:
…What was most exasperating to us are:
(a) those irresponsible sellers could have made use of the grace period given to them to change their mailing address (ie 28 days) and do something funny behind our back without our knowledge, ie., they could have gone to more moneylenders and borrow more money illegally using their old mailing address since it has yet to be changed. In fact, we do not quite understand why HDB nor ICA or any Government bodies did not enforce the ruling that once property is being transacted and sold on completion date, it is imperative that both buyer and seller must change their mailing address with immediate effect. This is clearly a loop-hole here and I believe anyone in our shoes will have the same wish as us that that this loop-hole could be addressed accordingly.
(b) We understand from the police that currently, borrowers are not made to face any penalty as their main target is to capture the moneylenders, not the borrowers. We are truly appalled to learn of this fact as we wonder why borrowers are not made to face any charges since they are the source of supply to the moneylenders. One would have understood the simple basis of demand-supply concept but again, this is clearly a loop-hole herein.
(c) We also understand from HDB that irresponsible sellers are not blacklisted from getting another flat from HDB in future.
Mr Yaw, can you imagine that not only we are stressed out and do not dare to start our renovation as we do not know when the moneylenders are going to strike again. Furthermore, we are unsure if anyone of them had misused the mailing address inappropriately and go to more moneylenders to borrow money (since they are not going to face any criminal offence) and we as the new buyer have to again suffer in their hands!...
--------
For Singapore’s current position on illegal money lending, please refer to: Ministry of Home Affairs Committee of Supply Debate 2011 – Speech by Senior Minister of State for Law and Home Affairs, Associate Professor Ho Peng Kee - Law And Order Situation, Loansharking, Casinos, Emergency Ambulance Services, 09 March 2011 (Note Paragraphs No. 21 – 25)
Read also 'The O $ P $ Issue' (TUESDAY, MAY 31, 2011)
…What was most exasperating to us are:
(a) those irresponsible sellers could have made use of the grace period given to them to change their mailing address (ie 28 days) and do something funny behind our back without our knowledge, ie., they could have gone to more moneylenders and borrow more money illegally using their old mailing address since it has yet to be changed. In fact, we do not quite understand why HDB nor ICA or any Government bodies did not enforce the ruling that once property is being transacted and sold on completion date, it is imperative that both buyer and seller must change their mailing address with immediate effect. This is clearly a loop-hole here and I believe anyone in our shoes will have the same wish as us that that this loop-hole could be addressed accordingly.
(b) We understand from the police that currently, borrowers are not made to face any penalty as their main target is to capture the moneylenders, not the borrowers. We are truly appalled to learn of this fact as we wonder why borrowers are not made to face any charges since they are the source of supply to the moneylenders. One would have understood the simple basis of demand-supply concept but again, this is clearly a loop-hole herein.
(c) We also understand from HDB that irresponsible sellers are not blacklisted from getting another flat from HDB in future.
Mr Yaw, can you imagine that not only we are stressed out and do not dare to start our renovation as we do not know when the moneylenders are going to strike again. Furthermore, we are unsure if anyone of them had misused the mailing address inappropriately and go to more moneylenders to borrow money (since they are not going to face any criminal offence) and we as the new buyer have to again suffer in their hands!...
--------
For Singapore’s current position on illegal money lending, please refer to: Ministry of Home Affairs Committee of Supply Debate 2011 – Speech by Senior Minister of State for Law and Home Affairs, Associate Professor Ho Peng Kee - Law And Order Situation, Loansharking, Casinos, Emergency Ambulance Services, 09 March 2011 (Note Paragraphs No. 21 – 25)
Read also 'The O $ P $ Issue' (TUESDAY, MAY 31, 2011)
Friday, August 05, 2011
MEDIA RELEASE: Aljunied-Hougang Town Council - Media Statement on Appointment of Managing Agent
Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) has appointed FM Solutions and Services Pte Ltd (FMSS) as its Managing Agent (MA), for a period of one year from 15 July 2011.
After the General Elections in May 2011, AHTC was legally constituted on 27 May. Under the timeline drawn up by the Ministry of National Development, the handover of management to new Town Councils was to be done by 1 August 2011.
Sometime in early June, following discussions initiated by the incumbent MA for Aljunied Town Council, it was mutually agreed that AHTC would in due course release the incumbent MA from further performance of the existing MA agreement.
AHTC also had the task of putting in place new computer and accounting systems, and time was needed for hardware procurement and software development.
Given the urgency of the timelines above, and the overriding concern that Town Council services should not be disrupted to the detriment of the Aljunied-Hougang residents, AHTC determined that the best course of action was not to call a tender for MA services for the transitional period, as there was insufficient time. Instead, AHTC decided to identify a service provider who was qualified and in a position to commence work immediately on taking over all aspects of MA services.
FMSS is a company incorporated in Singapore in May 2011. Its key management and staff are qualified and experienced in estate and township management, with proven track records. Its key directors have been in the field for an average of 20 years. FMSS has re-employed all 22 staff formerly working at Hougang Town Council and expanded to cater for the increased scope of works at AHTC. In that connection, it was made known to the incumbent MA that all employees who worked at the former Aljunied Town Council were welcome to apply for positions relating to AHTC.
FMSS currently has 73 staff. No Workers’ Party member has any interest in FMSS.
AHTC does not incur additional MA fees from appointing FMSS, as FMSS has agreed to assume the scope of works and pricing of the former MA for Aljunied Town Council, with only necessary adjustments made due to the electoral boundary changes from the inclusion of Kaki Bukit Division (formerly under the charge of Marine Parade Town Council) and the handing over of flats in Hougang Avenue 8 to Ang Mo Kio Town Council and Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council. FMSS has also agreed to take over the Hougang Town Council staff only at reimbursement costs, without any profit element.
In addition, at the request of AHTC, FMSS has agreed to undertake the MA appointment for one year only, which AHTC believes is a shorter than usual term for an MA, given the outlay required by the MA. AHTC expects that the operations in AHTC should be stable within one year, after which the MA contract would be up for tender.
AHTC has proceeded on this course as it is of the view that the above transitional arrangement is necessary and in the best interests of residents in Aljunied-Hougang.
Sylvia Lim
Chairman, AHTC
5 Aug 2011
After the General Elections in May 2011, AHTC was legally constituted on 27 May. Under the timeline drawn up by the Ministry of National Development, the handover of management to new Town Councils was to be done by 1 August 2011.
Sometime in early June, following discussions initiated by the incumbent MA for Aljunied Town Council, it was mutually agreed that AHTC would in due course release the incumbent MA from further performance of the existing MA agreement.
AHTC also had the task of putting in place new computer and accounting systems, and time was needed for hardware procurement and software development.
Given the urgency of the timelines above, and the overriding concern that Town Council services should not be disrupted to the detriment of the Aljunied-Hougang residents, AHTC determined that the best course of action was not to call a tender for MA services for the transitional period, as there was insufficient time. Instead, AHTC decided to identify a service provider who was qualified and in a position to commence work immediately on taking over all aspects of MA services.
FMSS is a company incorporated in Singapore in May 2011. Its key management and staff are qualified and experienced in estate and township management, with proven track records. Its key directors have been in the field for an average of 20 years. FMSS has re-employed all 22 staff formerly working at Hougang Town Council and expanded to cater for the increased scope of works at AHTC. In that connection, it was made known to the incumbent MA that all employees who worked at the former Aljunied Town Council were welcome to apply for positions relating to AHTC.
FMSS currently has 73 staff. No Workers’ Party member has any interest in FMSS.
AHTC does not incur additional MA fees from appointing FMSS, as FMSS has agreed to assume the scope of works and pricing of the former MA for Aljunied Town Council, with only necessary adjustments made due to the electoral boundary changes from the inclusion of Kaki Bukit Division (formerly under the charge of Marine Parade Town Council) and the handing over of flats in Hougang Avenue 8 to Ang Mo Kio Town Council and Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council. FMSS has also agreed to take over the Hougang Town Council staff only at reimbursement costs, without any profit element.
In addition, at the request of AHTC, FMSS has agreed to undertake the MA appointment for one year only, which AHTC believes is a shorter than usual term for an MA, given the outlay required by the MA. AHTC expects that the operations in AHTC should be stable within one year, after which the MA contract would be up for tender.
AHTC has proceeded on this course as it is of the view that the above transitional arrangement is necessary and in the best interests of residents in Aljunied-Hougang.
Sylvia Lim
Chairman, AHTC
5 Aug 2011
Road Safety along Hougang Ave 7
Dear Hougang Resident,
Please refer below, regarding LTA reply on our request to enhance road safety measures along Hoguang Avenue 7. Let us collectively do our parts, observe road safety (drive/ ride/ walk safely) and monitor the situation closely.
Thank you.
Best Regards
Shin Leong
---------
3 August 2011
Mr Yaw Shin Leong
Blk 701 Hougang Ave 2
#01-01 Singapore 530701
MP’s APPEAL – REQUEST FOR ROAD SAFETY MEASURES (NE-HOUGANG SMC)FEEDBACK NUMBER: 20110629-0800
Thank you for your feedback of 28th Jun 2011.
We noted on your concern about the traffic situation and safety of road users at the junction of Hougang Ave 7 and Upper Serangoon Road. We would like to share that recently we have implemented spring loaded pole at the centre diver and reduced the length of turning pocket at the junction of Hougang Ave 7/ Upper Serangoon Road/ Hougang Ave 8. This will help to enhance the safety of road users at the junction.
As for Hougang Ave 7, LTA has provided the “SLOW” road marking and speed regulating strips around the bend of Hougang Ave 7 to alert motorists to slow down approaching the junction of Hougang Ave 7/ Upper Serangoon Road. In addition there is an existing centre diver along Hougang Ave 7 which serves as a refuge for pedestrians who need to cross the road in two stages. At this juncture, there are also existing pedestrian crossing facilities to assist pedestrians to cross the road. Nevertheless we will continue to monitor the traffic situation and introduce suitable measures when necessary to improve the condition.
Lastly, we understand that HDB has plans to extend the existing Upper Serangoon View to serve future residential developments that are still under review. The extended road will be connected to Upper Serangoon Road for better traffic movement to cater to the future residential developments.
Once again, we thank you for your feedback.
Yours Sincerely,
Michael Yap
Manager, Feedback
-------------------
28 June 2011
HEAD
LAND TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
10 SIN MING DRIVE
SINGAPORE 575701
Dear Messer,
RE: REQUEST FOR ROAD SAFETY MEASURES
Lately, residents have given me feedback with regards to the traffic situation at the road junction of Hougang Avenue 7 and Upper Serangoon View.
It has been highlighted to me that motorists tend to speed along the Hougang Avenue 7, and there had been a few road accidents at this said junction lately. The residents staying in the vicinity are highly concern about the road safety at this junction. They are especially worried about the safety of their young children when they have to use the traffic junction on their way home from school.
I would like to request that LTA improve the road safety measures for this vicinity, as it seems to be an accident-prone area. In addition, as a high residential density area, more road and traffic infrastructure are important to enhance the safety of the road users in the vicinity.
Some residents had given me creative proposals such as having ‘SLOW’ road signs, speed traps and school zone alerts, etc. I believe LTA would have the means to evaluate the traffic infrastructure options available and implement them to enhance the road safety of the Hougang Avenue 7 road junction.
In addition, I would like to understand from LTA the blueprint for this road, in view of the upcoming residential projects that are developing in the area. With the increase in residential units in the vicinity, it is important that the roads must be developed, (including road safety systems) to cope with the increased traffic flow eventually.
I hope forward to a reply from you soon.
Let us work in partnership for the betterment of our community.
Thank you and best regards
Yours faithfully
YAW SHIN LEONG
Please refer below, regarding LTA reply on our request to enhance road safety measures along Hoguang Avenue 7. Let us collectively do our parts, observe road safety (drive/ ride/ walk safely) and monitor the situation closely.
Thank you.
Best Regards
Shin Leong
---------
3 August 2011
Mr Yaw Shin Leong
Blk 701 Hougang Ave 2
#01-01 Singapore 530701
MP’s APPEAL – REQUEST FOR ROAD SAFETY MEASURES (NE-HOUGANG SMC)FEEDBACK NUMBER: 20110629-0800
Thank you for your feedback of 28th Jun 2011.
We noted on your concern about the traffic situation and safety of road users at the junction of Hougang Ave 7 and Upper Serangoon Road. We would like to share that recently we have implemented spring loaded pole at the centre diver and reduced the length of turning pocket at the junction of Hougang Ave 7/ Upper Serangoon Road/ Hougang Ave 8. This will help to enhance the safety of road users at the junction.
As for Hougang Ave 7, LTA has provided the “SLOW” road marking and speed regulating strips around the bend of Hougang Ave 7 to alert motorists to slow down approaching the junction of Hougang Ave 7/ Upper Serangoon Road. In addition there is an existing centre diver along Hougang Ave 7 which serves as a refuge for pedestrians who need to cross the road in two stages. At this juncture, there are also existing pedestrian crossing facilities to assist pedestrians to cross the road. Nevertheless we will continue to monitor the traffic situation and introduce suitable measures when necessary to improve the condition.
Lastly, we understand that HDB has plans to extend the existing Upper Serangoon View to serve future residential developments that are still under review. The extended road will be connected to Upper Serangoon Road for better traffic movement to cater to the future residential developments.
Once again, we thank you for your feedback.
Yours Sincerely,
Michael Yap
Manager, Feedback
-------------------
28 June 2011
HEAD
LAND TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
10 SIN MING DRIVE
SINGAPORE 575701
Dear Messer,
RE: REQUEST FOR ROAD SAFETY MEASURES
Lately, residents have given me feedback with regards to the traffic situation at the road junction of Hougang Avenue 7 and Upper Serangoon View.
It has been highlighted to me that motorists tend to speed along the Hougang Avenue 7, and there had been a few road accidents at this said junction lately. The residents staying in the vicinity are highly concern about the road safety at this junction. They are especially worried about the safety of their young children when they have to use the traffic junction on their way home from school.
I would like to request that LTA improve the road safety measures for this vicinity, as it seems to be an accident-prone area. In addition, as a high residential density area, more road and traffic infrastructure are important to enhance the safety of the road users in the vicinity.
Some residents had given me creative proposals such as having ‘SLOW’ road signs, speed traps and school zone alerts, etc. I believe LTA would have the means to evaluate the traffic infrastructure options available and implement them to enhance the road safety of the Hougang Avenue 7 road junction.
In addition, I would like to understand from LTA the blueprint for this road, in view of the upcoming residential projects that are developing in the area. With the increase in residential units in the vicinity, it is important that the roads must be developed, (including road safety systems) to cope with the increased traffic flow eventually.
I hope forward to a reply from you soon.
Let us work in partnership for the betterment of our community.
Thank you and best regards
Yours faithfully
YAW SHIN LEONG
Wednesday, August 03, 2011
HDB to Review Model for Rental Housing Scheme
By: Leong Wee Keat (TODAY)
SINGAPORE - The Housing and Development Board (HDB) is reviewing the leasing model for the Interim Rental Housing scheme, which was launched in 2009 to help needy families find temporary accommodation while waiting for permanent housing solutions.
Currently, these families live in housing blocks spread across the island which are slated for redevelopment. These blocks are leased to operators - such as EM Services and LHN Group - to manage.
While the scheme provides units for rent "at below market rates", the operators can decide how much to charge other tenants, who could be Singaporeans, permanent residents, students or those with employment or S-Pass permits.
About 1,400 of the 2,200 flats slated for redevelopment are offered at market rental rates, while 800 are set aside for interim rental housing.
Responding to Today's queries, the HDB said it "has drawn learning points from the current contracts" and more details will be made available once the review is complete. The HDB's response comes amid calls by at least two Members of Parliament (MPs) for the authority to review the scheme in view of the shortage of such units.
Mountbatten MP Lim Biow Chuan has received "many requests from residents" seeking rental flats. He has also asked the Minister for National Development to consider whether existing rental flats at Dakota Crescent could be used to help meet the shortfall in supply.
"This would mean taking back the flats from EM Services after their contract to manage these flats has expired," Mr Lim wrote on his Facebook page recently. "It would also mean displacing some of the existing tenants (some foreigners and some Singaporeans). But the priority should always be to house Singaporeans."
Meanwhile, Hougang MP Yaw Shin Leong noted that there are "many" residents seeking rental flats from the HDB and most had been waiting for at least two to three months. He has come across two Hougang constituents being charged S$1,600 and S$2,450 by EM Services for the rental of flats.
According to EM Services, the S$2,450 rental was charged to a tenant who has been in arrears since November last year.
"Upon expiration of the contract, double rent has been charged, according to the market practice," an EM Services spokesperson said in response to Today's queries.
For the three- and four-room flats leased to EM Services in Hougang, the HDB said it will review the uses of these flats following the expiry of the leasing contract in March next year.
Still, Mr Yaw felt it "is timely for the Government" to re-visit the issue of the HDB running EM Services - a joint venture between the HDB and Keppel Land Limited.
To this, the HDB clarified that the authority does not run a commercial arm with the aim of renting out HDB flats for profit. The HDB incorporated EM Services in 1988 to provide managing agency services to Town Councils, which "remains its core function today".
The HDB explained it engaged EM Services in 2009 to run a pilot project to provide interim rental housing at below market rates to help needy families who are unable to afford open market rents.
------
Also read 'Revisiting Profiteering From Public Housing'
SINGAPORE - The Housing and Development Board (HDB) is reviewing the leasing model for the Interim Rental Housing scheme, which was launched in 2009 to help needy families find temporary accommodation while waiting for permanent housing solutions.
Currently, these families live in housing blocks spread across the island which are slated for redevelopment. These blocks are leased to operators - such as EM Services and LHN Group - to manage.
While the scheme provides units for rent "at below market rates", the operators can decide how much to charge other tenants, who could be Singaporeans, permanent residents, students or those with employment or S-Pass permits.
About 1,400 of the 2,200 flats slated for redevelopment are offered at market rental rates, while 800 are set aside for interim rental housing.
Responding to Today's queries, the HDB said it "has drawn learning points from the current contracts" and more details will be made available once the review is complete. The HDB's response comes amid calls by at least two Members of Parliament (MPs) for the authority to review the scheme in view of the shortage of such units.
Mountbatten MP Lim Biow Chuan has received "many requests from residents" seeking rental flats. He has also asked the Minister for National Development to consider whether existing rental flats at Dakota Crescent could be used to help meet the shortfall in supply.
"This would mean taking back the flats from EM Services after their contract to manage these flats has expired," Mr Lim wrote on his Facebook page recently. "It would also mean displacing some of the existing tenants (some foreigners and some Singaporeans). But the priority should always be to house Singaporeans."
Meanwhile, Hougang MP Yaw Shin Leong noted that there are "many" residents seeking rental flats from the HDB and most had been waiting for at least two to three months. He has come across two Hougang constituents being charged S$1,600 and S$2,450 by EM Services for the rental of flats.
According to EM Services, the S$2,450 rental was charged to a tenant who has been in arrears since November last year.
"Upon expiration of the contract, double rent has been charged, according to the market practice," an EM Services spokesperson said in response to Today's queries.
For the three- and four-room flats leased to EM Services in Hougang, the HDB said it will review the uses of these flats following the expiry of the leasing contract in March next year.
Still, Mr Yaw felt it "is timely for the Government" to re-visit the issue of the HDB running EM Services - a joint venture between the HDB and Keppel Land Limited.
To this, the HDB clarified that the authority does not run a commercial arm with the aim of renting out HDB flats for profit. The HDB incorporated EM Services in 1988 to provide managing agency services to Town Councils, which "remains its core function today".
The HDB explained it engaged EM Services in 2009 to run a pilot project to provide interim rental housing at below market rates to help needy families who are unable to afford open market rents.
------
Also read 'Revisiting Profiteering From Public Housing'
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)