Saturday, June 26, 2010

Informal Communities' Outreach Chit-Chat

Several WP activists held an informal dialogue with fellow Singaporeans to discuss challenges facing Singaporean communities this afternoon.

This dialogue series is known as the ‘Informal Communities’ Outreach Chit-Chat’ (ICOC) and is the 2nd session of this series.

During today’s session, candid opinions were shared and some forward strategies were also suggested. Each participant enjoyed ourselves and we are already looking forward to the next session.

On The Formation Of The Socialist Party

I refer to my comments to Shin Min Daily on the formation of The Socialist Party (24th June 2010).

I said that WP welcomes the new political party’s formation and will work together with members of the new party for the betterment of Singapore.

When asked me if the entry of newer opposition parties will result in the erosion of support for the Workers' Party, such as due to possible three cornered fights?

I replied that by convention, WP will take part in the inter-opposition-parties' dialogue, usually held after the release of the boundaries’ report to prevent the occurrence of three cornered-fights.

On the other hand if 3 cornered-fights are to unfortunately happen, the WP being an established political party trusts in the collective wisdom of Singaporeans to choose what is best for Singapore.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Nine Years & Soldiering On

Tomorrow (24th June 2010) marks the commencement of my 10th year of political activism with the Workers’ Party. Concurrently this month also marks the completion of my 4th term of WP’s Central Executive Council (CEC) stewardship. Typically during this period, I will spend time to reflect, improve and share. Below are some of my thoughts:

Gaining Priceless Experiences

Earlier this month, an academic colleague of mine innocently asked me the following question, “What are the benefits of joining the Workers’ Party?” I paused for a second and responded, “Tangibly nothing to speak of, but what I have gained are priceless experiences which money cannot buy.”

Then again, over the years I have question myself many times, why am I doing what I am doing? This question typically props up during pre-dawn hours on Sundays. Especially during the initial beeps of my alarm clock, waking me up so that I could go forth happily to coordinate the logistics train for WP’s public outreaches!

Given the deprivation of a few more hours of sleep each Sunday, what gains could that be? Actually there are. To share just two examples, both organizational duty and discipline have been deeply embedded within me. This is partially facilitated by the fact that being a logistics coordinator, being punctual is clearly not sufficient. Rather being early is ‘required’ so that operational start times will not be compromised. I am proud to share that throughout these years, I have always been early :)

Sharpening Thinking Processes

On another note, two months ago, a good friend of mine commented that, ‘Your many years of activism have made a difference in you’. For some reasons at that moment, I briefly wondered about the semantics differences between the variables of ‘many, years, activism, difference and you’. A split second later, I merely responded him, “Yar, should be lah”. The explanation for my “Yar, should be lah” response was because at that moment I was unable to pin-point a specific area where political activism had made a direct impact on me.

However later that week, I pondered and concluded that activism had indeed made a difference, especially it has moderated the way on how I make decisions and judgments. The reason is because political activism requires me to meet with multitudes of people, to categorize priorities and to solve issues. These in turn require me to be sharp with my thinking and responses.

Particularly, political activism has necessitated me to operate under a perpetual ‘multiple variables analysis filter’ mode, which requires a fine balance between the considerations of processes and outcomes. This is especially so when deciding upon decision alternatives and exercising discernment over manpower deployments.

Maintaining Life’s Balance

In an earlier blog piece titled ‘A Certain Type For Singapore (Part 3)’ I shared about the excessiveness of activism and I reflected upon the following:

“Political activism has also taught me that idealism must be equally matched by realism. This is especially true in the financial aspects of things. For one to be able to offer himself to serve his fellow country men, he must first and foremost be responsible about the well being of himself and family.”

Indeed, during my earlier years of political activism with WP, I was juggling between multiple portfolios and projects. That was also largely due to the lack of manpower then. Nonetheless the idealistic me was very willing to ‘charge all the way’ but the realities of life had since molded me to ‘pace all the way’ and to ‘charge only when the necessity arises’.

Since July 2006, I vested much time & efforts to develop both my business and lecturing career. Hence at the WP front, instead of holding multiple portfolios, currently I hold only 1 primary portfolio (i.e.) being WP’s Co-Organising Secretary (OS). Working alongside fellow WP leaders, I make sure that I discharge my OS duties well by synergizing all my efforts alongside fellow WP activists. In this way, I can effectively ‘pace all the way’ and ‘charge only when the necessity arises’.

The same good friend of mine, whom I mentioned earlier, incidentally emailed me last night in the midst of my reflections. In that encouragement email, he gently reminded me for the need for me to adopt a "balance" approach in my life. I am thankful for his reminder.

Joining The Workers’ Party

Your timing can’t be better. This is because there can never be a ‘best’ time to join the Workers’ Party and Singapore needs you now. The winds of change are blowing. Be part of it!

Therefore it remains my political resolve to continue identifying, cultivating and multiplying a certain type of Singaporean, who is for Singapore, pro Singapore and loves Singapore. This certain type must be highly committed to Singapore's national development and is radically committed to serve Singapore via the Workers’ Party.

Such a Singaporean sees the critical need to invest his/ her life in identifying, cultivating and multiplying similar types. A profound sense of destiny, blind loyalty and intense passion for Singapore are the hallmarks of such an individual.

Will you join me?

Link:
A Certain Type For Singapore’ (Yaw Shin Leong, 2007)

Friday, June 18, 2010

Once in 50 Years?

I refer to the news report ‘Clogged canal caused flash floods, says PUB’ TODAY (18th June 2010).

Two days ago, an ex-student of mine from Indonesia instant-messaged me the following ‘Sir, Sir, heard that Singapore got flooding is it?!’ Pretending to be nonchalant, I merely replied ‘Yar’.

Yesterday, a posting in a fellow WP activist (Pritam Singh)’s Facebook page (dated Wednesday at 12:08pm) caught my attention. His posting goes like this: “It is not possible... to plan for every event. Thursday's weather... occurs once in 50 years" - Yaacob Ibrahim, Minister for Environment and Water Resources/ 21 Nov 2009.

Not more than 8 months later, an occurrence that supposedly should occur 50 years later occurred once again. This time round, it actually happened in the tourism heart of Singapore...

Minister Yaacob’s statement coming back to haunt him aside, it led me to think hard, why was I pretending to be nonchalant in the first place when responding to my ex-student?

Then I realized, it was because my national pride has been somehow pricked by my ex-student’s seemingly innocent question. Ouch!

New Link:
‘Clogged canal caused flash floods, says PUB’ TODAY (18th June 2010)

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Empathy, Empathy, Where Art Thou?

I refer to the news report ‘Little Political Impact in Town Council Report’ (Straits Times, 12th June 2010)

In my opinion, even if the released Town Council Report was indeed meant to create ‘political impact’ to the disadvantage of the opposition-run town councils. I am of the view that the report might have potentially achieved the contrary.

Pertaining to the situation of SC/CC arrears, fellow Singaporeans should be able to discern for ourselves that opposition-run town councils, specifically WP-run HGTC has more empathy towards residents who are in financial difficulties and via compassionate assistance, allow residents to pay their arrears by means of monthly installments to ease their financial hardships.

Of course, empathy must be administered with discernment and prudence, in cases where residents fail to pay or respond to HGTC’s reminder for payment, summons will still be issued to attend court. Such a procedure in place will ensure that the empathy element will be in place even in the administrative function of SC/CC collection to ensure that the arrears situation remains manageable.

More importantly, WP-run HGTC does not believe in writing off arrears of residents who repeatedly failed to pay as bad debts in order to reduce the total amount of arrears. The rationale is that, if this is to be done, it will not be fair to residents who have been paying promptly. This means for those residents who continue not to pay, late payment interest is imposed and they will have to pay their total arrears with late payment interest.

Lastly I agree with the concerns of MP Low Thia Khiang that such an exercise of TCMR will inevitably require respective TCs to put in more resources and would certainly translate into higher operating cost, resulting in residents potentially ending up paying higher SC/CC.

For residents living in PAP-run Town Councils, perhaps the question to ask should be ‘Empathy, Empathy, where art thou?’

News Link:
Little Political Impact in Town Council Report (Straits Times, 12th June 2010)

Tuesday, June 08, 2010

Why Pay?

I refer to the news report ‘Group walked through casino without paying’ (TODAY, 8th June 2010)

The second paragraph of the news report caught my attention.

“Even Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong paid $100 when he and some grassroots leaders visited Resorts World Sentosa "to take a look" a few weeks after it opened, "No choice, all Singaporeans must buy!" he had recounted in a speech last month.”

*It is exemplary of our Prime Minister to pay $100 for his Casino entry instead of visiting in his official VIP capacity (hence presumed to be free). However I can’t help but noticed PM Lee’s choice of word in his speech last month, specifically the word ‘buy’ instead of ‘pay’.

Technically PM Lee is actually right. According to Cambridge’s online dictionary, the word ‘buy’ (being a verb) is to get something by paying money for it. Whereas the word ‘pay’ (being a verb) is to give money to someone for something you want to buy or for services provided.

Linguistically, PM Lee is just being shrewd. This is because from a language posturing perspective, it makes much sense to use a word with more-positive connotation rather than that of a less-positive connotation.

Politically, I disagree with PM Lee. It should be ‘You have a choice. Not all Singaporeans have to pay!’. Whenever we buy, we acquire something, whenever we pay, we part with something. *Therefore Singaporeans should instead ask ‘Why Pay’?

*Disclaimer: This is not an endorsement by the author for would-be acts of gambling or the building of the casinos in the first instance.

Links:

1) ‘Group walked through casino without paying’ (TODAY)
2) Cambridge Dictionary Definition of ‘Pay’
3) Cambridge Dictionary Definition of ‘Buy’